just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case. Btw, I think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for additional validation.
Regards, Matthias On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Glenn > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 > AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1. Thanks, > > From: "Niketan Pansare" <npan...@us.ibm.com> > To: dev@systemml.apache.org > Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM > Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline > ------------------------------ > > > > > +1. > > Thanks, > > Niketan. > > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code > > generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our > > upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it > would > > be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot for > a > > release candidate Dec 1? > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > >
