+1 Regards, Krishna
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> wrote: > just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and > issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine > except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case. Btw, I > think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for additional > validation. > > Regards, > Matthias > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Glenn > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 > 06:51:44 > > AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1. > Thanks, > > > > From: "Niketan Pansare" <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM > > Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +1. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Niketan. > > > > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code > > > generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our > > > upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it > > would > > > be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot > for > > a > > > release candidate Dec 1? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > >
