Hi Luciano, Initial page: > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and I > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies the > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner on > the initial page.
Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the initial page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently designing this section and will send a pull request once completed. Navigation Menu: > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few duplications. > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also have > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers that > include the old page listing all committers. Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his updates once they are finished. Hope this clears things up! Best, Jason On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master branch > : > > Initial page: > > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and I > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies the > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner on > the initial page. > > Navigation Menu: > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few duplications. > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also have > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers that > include the old page listing all committers. > > > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I think we > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the live > website. > > Thoughts ? > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
