Hi Deron, Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were aware of this discrepancy.
[image: Inline image 1] On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead > and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more > frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized. > > Deron > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the > > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree? > > > > Deron > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Luciano, > >> > >> Initial page: > >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? > I > >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, > >> but it > >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, > >> and I > >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies > >> the > >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the > banner > >> on > >> > the initial page. > >> > >> > >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the > >> initial > >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to > >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently > >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed. > >> > >> Navigation Menu: > >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few > >> duplications. > >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also > >> have > >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers > using > >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers > >> that > >> > include the old page listing all committers. > >> > >> > >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his > >> updates > >> once they are finished. > >> > >> Hope this clears things up! > >> > >> Best, > >> Jason > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master > >> branch > >> > : > >> > > >> > Initial page: > >> > > >> > - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? > I > >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, > >> but it > >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, > >> and I > >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies > >> the > >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the > banner > >> on > >> > the initial page. > >> > > >> > Navigation Menu: > >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few > >> duplications. > >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also > >> have > >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers > using > >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers > >> that > >> > include the old page listing all committers. > >> > > >> > > >> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I > think > >> we > >> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the > >> live > >> > website. > >> > > >> > Thoughts ? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Luciano Resende > >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >> > > >> > > > > >
