Great! If you wanted to get the ball rolling on those things I can say you have my "vote" for doing something like this.
Obviously there's a lot of administrative things we'd need to figure out but it sounds like good stuff...As long as we don't make anything officially available to people until Daniel's license click through work is complete we should be safe. (i hope/think) On 8/29/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the reply to my query... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Hypothetical New Code Scenario... On 8/29/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > Suppose the Tapestry TLP project creates a new subproject called "Tapestry > Commons." Then, I want to add some code that I've developed outside of the > ASF to the Tapestry Commons subproject. Does that code have to go through > the incubator? My guess is that it does so that we avoid licensing/IP > issues. But, I just want to verify. Yes, it'll just need the IP clearance forms detailed in: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html HTH. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
