Not sure.
t5cayenne does.
chenille-kit does.
I took a look through the 3rd-party libraries listed on the page and
didn't see any others.
It's probably worth asking on the user-list, however. If chenille-kit
and t5cayenne are the only two libraries that use slashes, then it
would probably be fine to proceed as-is, although I suspect a lot of
people use chenille-kit.
Robert
On May 4, 2010, at 5/43:59 PM , Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Point taken. How may 3rd party libraries do, in fact, have slashes in
the virtual folder name?
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Robert Zeigler <robe...@scazdl.org>
wrote:
Documented != ok. :)
What this basically means is that nobody would be able to upgrade to
tapestry 5.2 until every 3rd party library they use updated their
source
tree.
Do we really want to hinder upgrade adoption in that way?
I can understand the need to eliminate slashes, but is there no way
that we
can grandfather this in for a release before dropping slash support
completely?
That would allow people to upgrade and give library authors the
time to put
out a new release without slashes that would be forwards compatible
with
tapestry 5.2.
Robert
On May 4, 2010, at 5/412:33 PM , Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Robert Zeigler
<robe...@scazdl.org> wrote:
-1.
I'm not opposed to a release generally, but I found something that
disturbed
me the other day, and haven't had a chance to track it down.
I had an app that was running fine on 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT, and then
there was
a
change in the code (related to external library loading), and my
app
broke
with a message about slashes in library mappings.
This is true and documented in the upgrade notes.
I'm concerned that many people are going to have ugly upgrade
experiences
with this recent change when their app stops working due to 3rd-
party
library contributions breaking.
I think I will have some time this evening to look this issue
over and
see
if it really is an issue; I may revise my vote at that point.
Robert
On May 4, 2010, at 5/41:39 AM , Igor Drobiazko wrote:
Tapestry 5.1.0.5 has been released one year ago and think we
need a new
release. We've fixed around 160 issues, we have a lot of
improvements
and
bug fixes.
There are so much new features I can't live without. I would
love to
upgrade my apps. What do you think about a 5.2.0 release?
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact
me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
