On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:37:47 -0200, Josh Canfield <[email protected]>
wrote:
Alternately, perhaps we need to resuscitate the idea of a standard
library (or libraries) beyond core.
My gut tells me to pull as much of the system apart into independent
modules as possible. Smaller is better, easier to understand, easier
to test.
Please do it as a Tapestry subproject (tapestry-morecomponents?) instead
of TapX or other external packages. It seems to me that people consider
anything outside the Tapestry project, even being linked from there, as
not part of the out-of-the-box experience. Something like "feature X is so
important, but I need a third-party package to have it" (something used a
lot to criticize JSF).
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
