On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:00:09 -0200, Igor Drobiazko
<[email protected]> wrote:
I would love to see even more components inside core. A rich set of
components is the most appealing feature for a component-oriented
framework. The more out-of-the box components available the better.
Agreed, but what meaning do we use for "out-of-the-box"? Inside
tapestry-core? Or also including anything that is provided as a Tapestry
subproject? My vote is for the second meaning, specially when Tapestry-IoC
makes it just a matter of including the JAR in the classpath.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
