On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:21:34 -0300, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Any suffix put pressure on the user and almost all users tend to avoid >> the usage of a "release with a suffix". > Yep, but we're talking about adding a suffix to non-stable releases (I > guess), and their use should only be made by people comfortable with it, of > course.. :) > I do think that we need a clearer distinction of stable and non-stable > releases. What in "5.3.0" says it's not a stable release? ;)
What in particular makes 5.3.0 unstable? Just because it's the first of 5.3 line or because it's the latest or do you have a specific concern? Kalle --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
