On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Bob Harner <bobhar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, I am truly stunned. I'm not sure I've ever seen a piece of software so > completely disregard the common sense meaning of a commonly understood word. > So "required" sometimes means "optional if certain conditions are met > elsewhere". And users are just supposed to figure that out on their own??? If you're stunned please stop banging your head against the wall. BTW I find completely usual having a piece of software requiring something and having another piece of software providing it. It seems obvious that the latter could be user's code or another module of the same software or a third party module too. It's certain that you know better than me the English language but from my perspective there's not contradiction here. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
