I don't really like hacks like extracting the value or calling process submission also RadioGroup will not work because it doesn't have a client id.
Right now I would rather see small changes to add support for a zone param on Checkbox and RadioGroup and refactoring after 5.3. Denis Aug 24, 2011 v 10:32 AM, Andreas Andreou: > I'm away on vacations so i didn't commit any code to apache svn. > > But you can take a look of what's involved at > https://github.com/andyhot/tapestry5/commits/trunk > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 13:44, Denis Stepanov <denis.stepa...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I would like to have a zone param support for Chechbox and RadioGroup in 5.3. >> >> Will you manage to finish the refactoring into this version? >> >> Denis >> >> Aug 16, 2011 v 11:41 PM, Andreas Andreou: >> >>> :) Your patch is ok - it's basically a copy of the Select code that >>> did the same thing - but >>> what i'd like to do is investigate how to further improve on that. One >>> way is by generalizing >>> and reusing (instead of copy&pasting) and the other relates to reusing >>> AbstractField#processSubmission (that's what really allows impementing >>> this without >>> touching subclasses) >> >> > > > > -- > Andreas Andreou - andy...@apache.org - http://blog.andyhot.gr > Apache Tapestry PMC / http://chesstu.be owner > Open Source / JEE Consulting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
