Git mv -----Original Message----- From: "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo" <thiag...@gmail.com> Sent: 10/10/2014 16:20 To: "Tapestry development" <dev@tapestry.apache.org> Subject: Re: BeanModel classes as a separate project and/or JAR?
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 03:28:52 -0300, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Yes... It would be a dependency rather than the same package. Either way > it's the same net result (tapestry-ioc on the classpath when all you > wanted was a bean mapper). That's the bloatware I was speaking of. I see. I agree this is far from ideal, but it may not be possible to do it in another way. I don't know yet. Regarding Git, is there any way of copying files from one folder to another without losing its history? > On 9 Oct 2014 22:19, "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo" <thiag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:42:48 -0300, Lance Java >> <lance.j...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >> For a BeanModel framework to come packaged with tapestry-ioc feels like >>> bloatware to me. >>> >> >> I suggested a BeanModel JAR with a dependency on Tapestry-IoC, not >> including Tapestry-IoC, in case we cannot really make a standalone >> BeanModel JAR. >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer >> http://machina.com.br >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer http://machina.com.br --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
