On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:21:34 -0300, Dimitris Zenios
<[email protected]> wrote:
Git mv
Thanks!
Do you guys think this change should have a vote before it's done?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo" <[email protected]>
Sent: 10/10/2014 16:20
To: "Tapestry development" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: BeanModel classes as a separate project and/or JAR?
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 03:28:52 -0300, Lance Java
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Yes... It would be a dependency rather than the same package. Either way
it's the same net result (tapestry-ioc on the classpath when all you
wanted was a bean mapper). That's the bloatware I was speaking of.
I see. I agree this is far from ideal, but it may not be possible to do
it
in another way. I don't know yet.
Regarding Git, is there any way of copying files from one folder to
another without losing its history?
On 9 Oct 2014 22:19, "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo"
<[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:42:48 -0300, Lance Java
<[email protected]>
wrote:
For a BeanModel framework to come packaged with tapestry-ioc feels
like
bloatware to me.
I suggested a BeanModel JAR with a dependency on Tapestry-IoC, not
including Tapestry-IoC, in case we cannot really make a standalone
BeanModel JAR.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
