Thanks. You can probably guess how I too found out about it. I'm inclined to side with Jochen on this, that it's a step backwards. Howard had written in the comments that it may cause id conflicts and if we don't even know why it was changed, we could just as well roll it back.
Kalle On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Balázs Palcsó <palcso.bal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kalle, > > I am not sure what is the reason, but I opened an issue after this change: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2482 , because my tapestry > testify tests started to fail due to this. > > Regards, > Balazs > > On 27 August 2015 at 22:19, Kalle Korhonen <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > In 22bd2c14b3c7d91ebd97cbc264882552c12044f7 (since 5.4-beta-31), Howard > had > > changed the form control name to be based on component's simple id > instead > > of the component's client-side id. This change is not based on any open > > issue, so I'm just trying to find the reason for the change? > > > > Kalle > > >
