Hi Shoaib,
Yes - finding time can be a problem. Maybe helping other people to get
involved is the way to make progress.
A useful step would be to sketch out what tasks are needed to make
progress towards a release of taverna-osgi.
The places people can go to find out what a project is doing are the
mailing lists, JIRA etc. The IPMC needs to discuss in public.
Andy
On 02/11/15 15:40, Shoaib Sufi wrote:
Hi,
The problem is there are new project coming online that Stian and Ian are
focused on at the moment, but the good news is that come Jan/Feb one of
those projects is really depending upon Taverna so there will be an
increase in effort and opportunities to community build across institutions.
I am not saying nothing is happening because I know Stian and others are
working on things but this is just a lull not the default state by any
means.
>
Best
Shoaib
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: What next after the release?
To: [email protected]
It is still very quiet.
Is there something temporary holding up discussions on dev@ or is this the
default state of the podling?
Nothing seems to have happened about Stian's "I believe taverna-osgi is
ready for release now" except as far as I can see, downstream jobs don't
work (I don't know if that matters or not).
Taverna next reports in the December cycle (which starts end of November).
Andy
On 13/10/15 19:19, Pierce, Marlon wrote:
Good question. The dev list has been very quiet following the initial
release and the GSOC wrap-ups.
Marlon
On 10/13/15, 4:20 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote:
Was there a conclusion to this discussion?
Getting more of the codebase released would seem like a good next step.
Andy
