b49020 commented on PR #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-trustzone-sdk/pull/114#issuecomment-1869494073
@DemesneGH How about we rather stick the `std` based TAs to `v0.2.0` of `optee-utee` crate and merge `no-std` feature in a later version of `optee-utee` crate using latest rust toolchain? Although I am still uncertain about stability (reasons already provided [here](https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-trustzone-sdk/issues/113#issuecomment-1824164889)) of `aarch64-unknown-optee-trustzone` target but we shouldn't gate OP-TEE rust development for its availability upstream. BTW, we can very well uprev `std` TAs once we have that upstream support available. This will atleast allow the adoption of `no-std` TAs with migration option for other `std` TAs as well. Also, as I mentioned earlier we would like to provide OP-TEE community with standardized rust environment to develop standalone TAs. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@teaclave.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@teaclave.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@teaclave.apache.org
