[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13960510#comment-13960510
]
Dave Watson commented on THRIFT-2429:
-------------------------------------
It parses the struct annotations: parseTerseWrites(tstruct->annotations_)
So like:
struct Foo {
} (terse_writes = 'true')
Although I don't see anyone using this feature at Facebook.
The diff will need some small modifications based on whatever defaults we
decide - do we even want this to be an optional feature with a flag, or just
always on?
> Provide option to not write default values, rely on receiver default
> construction instead
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-2429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2429
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++ - Compiler
> Affects Versions: 0.9.1
> Reporter: Chris Stylianou
> Assignee: Randy Abernethy
> Labels: default, optional, required
>
> Would there be any objections to a patch that does not write default values
> (essentially the same logic as the optional attributes). This obviously
> relies on the receiving application using the same IDL version to ensure the
> defaults used on object construction match the senders.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
