I should have said that there were changes, but nothing that looked linear in the number of fields. But like I said, I no longer know any relevant assembly languages ....
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Chet Murthy <murthy.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [Just out of curiousity, I wrote a program with 64 bit fields, and looked > at the assembler. Then I reduced it to 20 fields, and compared. Just to > see if there was a difference in size (which there would have to be, if > there was anything related to # of fields, affecting code. No change. > Sadly, the last assembler I knew was VAX, so I couldn't actually understand > the assembler ... <sigh>] > >> >>
