[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17367618#comment-17367618
 ] 

Sai Hemanth Gantasala commented on THRIFT-2877:
-----------------------------------------------

 
{code:java}
 case t_base_type::TYPE_I64:   
 case t_base_type::TYPE_DOUBLE:         
   indent(out) << "hashCode = hashCode * " << MUL << " + 
org.apache.thrift.TBaseHelper.hashCode(" << name << ");" << endl;   
 break; {code}
This particular change seems to be breaking interoperability between new thrift 
servers (eg: 0.13) and older thrift clients (0.9.3)
TbaseHelper on the client is unable to execute the deserialized object because 
the server is sending hashcode method which is not present on the client-side.
How do we work around this issue? cc [~roshangeorge]
 

> Optimize generated hashCode
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-2877
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2877
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java - Compiler
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.3
>            Reporter: Mike Rettig
>            Assignee: Roshan George
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>
> The generated java hashCode method allocates an ArrayList then appends the 
> fields to the list.  Primitive fields will be boxed when added to the list. 
> The generated code shouldn't allocate a list or box primitives.  The hashCode 
> can be calculated by using a primitive int and some static utility methods 
> which can return the hashCode for each type.
>  out << indent() << "@Override" << endl << indent() << "public int hashCode() 
> {" << endl;
> 1839   indent_up();
> 1840   indent(out) << "List<Object> list = new ArrayList<Object>();" << endl;
> 1841 
> 1842   for (m_iter = members.begin(); m_iter != members.end(); ++m_iter) {
> 1843     out << endl;
> 1844 
> 1845     t_type* t = get_true_type((*m_iter)->get_type());
> 1846     bool is_optional = (*m_iter)->get_req() == t_field::T_OPTIONAL;
> 1847     bool can_be_null = type_can_be_null(t);
> 1848     string name = (*m_iter)->get_name();
> 1849 
> 1850     string present = "true";
> 1851 
> 1852     if (is_optional || can_be_null) {
> 1853       present += " && (" + generate_isset_check(*m_iter) + ")";
> 1854     }
> 1855 
> 1856     indent(out) << "boolean present_" << name << " = " << present << ";" 
> << endl;
> 1857     indent(out) << "list.add(present_" << name << ");" << endl;
> 1858     indent(out) << "if (present_" << name << ")" << endl;
> 1859     if (t->is_enum()) {
> 1860       indent(out) << "  list.add(" << name << ".getValue());" << endl;
> 1861     } else {
> 1862       indent(out) << "  list.add(" << name << ");" << endl;
> 1863     }
> 1864   }
> 1865 
> 1866   out << endl;
> 1867   indent(out) << "return list.hashCode();" << endl;
> 1868   indent_down();
> 1869   indent(out) << "}" << endl << endl;
> 1870 }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to