On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Michael McCandless > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> (should we name it apache-tika-app-NN.jar in the future? Ie, add >> apache- in front) > > I don't think that's needed, just like the httpd binary is not called > apache-http-server. > > I'd rather keep the runnable jar name as short as possible. Ideally > we'd even drop the -app part, but that would make the Maven setup a > bit awkward.
OK, the http precedent and keeping the runnable jar's name short make sense. And I agree dropping -app would be great... but sounds not-easy. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com
