Why won't call it:* tikap* (tika application, and sounds like tea cup) ? :-)
BR, Oleg On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Michael McCandless > > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> (should we name it apache-tika-app-NN.jar in the future? Ie, add > >> apache- in front) > > > > I don't think that's needed, just like the httpd binary is not called > > apache-http-server. > > > > I'd rather keep the runnable jar name as short as possible. Ideally > > we'd even drop the -app part, but that would make the Maven setup a > > bit awkward. > > OK, the http precedent and keeping the runnable jar's name short > make sense. > > And I agree dropping -app would be great... but sounds not-easy. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com >
