+1 I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed.
Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory? Also, we used to name it apache-tika-1.1.src.* but now we dropped the apache- prefix? Is that intentional? (tika-app jar has never had the apache prefix I think...). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > A candidate for the Tika 1.2 release is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.2/rc1/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/tags/1.2/ > > The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 8146c1161d35e6b1dc670d078a773f96c37eef8c. > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.2. > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.2 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Chris > > P.S. Here's my +1. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >
