There isn't a process on this earth that Chris doesn't have a document
for.....

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Bob Paulin <b...@bobpaulin.com> wrote:

> Chris,
>
> This makes sense to me.  I think with git there's a lot of different ways
> to do things so I think as long as we have a documented way of getting
> patches from the community that's what's important.  Thanks!
>
> - Bob
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Bob. We don’t always have to do patches right now in Tika.
> > Use CTR if it’s a new area of the code base, and/or if you feel
> > reasonable about it being a small enough change to go ahead. Use
> > RTC If you’d like a review and your peers to look at it - if it’s
> > a long standing area of the code base, etc etc.
> >
> > So either way is fine with me and yes, we’d be moving into that
> > type of workflow. I don’t see getting rid of JIRA though - for
> > example this workflow:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/tika/#contributing-via-github
> >
> >
> > is what I was thinking just instead of the last (not shown) steps
> > being e.g.,
> >
> > git apply < http://github.com/apache/tika/pull/#.patch
> > svn add *
> > svn commit
> >
> > something instead being
> >
> > git pull http://github.com/user/tika/branch
> > git push -u origin master
> >
> > where origin are the ASF writeable repos.
> >
> > HTH!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > Chief Architect
> > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> > WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob Paulin <b...@bobpaulin.com>
> > Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
> > Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 9:52 AM
> > To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git
> >
> > >+1 from Me.  Most of my work today is also on Git.  Just to be clear
> we'd
> > >be moving from an SVN workflow patch -> trunk to git workflow PR ->
> > >master.  \
> > >- Bob
> > >
> > >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Tyler Palsulich <tpalsul...@gmail.com>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 from me.
> > >>
> > >> Tyler
> > >> On Nov 18, 2015 6:46 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <
> > >> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hey Team,
> > >> >
> > >> > I propose we move to writeable git repos for Tika for our
> repository.
> > >> > I mostly interact with Git & Github nowadays even with Tika using
> the
> > >> > mirroring and PR interaction support.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thoughts?
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> > Chris
> > >> >
> > >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > >> > Chief Architect
> > >> > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> > >> > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > >> > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> > >> > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> > >> > WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > >> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to