[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15163016#comment-15163016
 ] 

Nick Burch commented on TIKA-1868:
----------------------------------

I'm not sure why you'd want to be using that Tika Server exception on its own? 
It's intended for the Tika Server only, which as stated you shouldn't be using 
except by running

If you think that the RichTextContentHandler would be useful generally (i.e. 
outside the server), you should open a request to have that moved over to the 
core package

> create clean tika-server jar and shaded classifier jar
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-1868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1868
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 1.11, 1.12
>         Environment: n/a
>            Reporter: John Patrick
>              Labels: github-import, maven, newbie, patch
>             Fix For: 1.13
>
>
> If using tika-server-VERSION.jar as a standalone component it works. But if 
> you use it as a dependency so is included with other jars then it causes 
> classpath issues specifically around jackson.
> The project I'm working on is using Jackson 2.6.1, we have just added tika 
> but when adding tika-server-VERSION.jar we have discovered it contains 
> Jackson 2.4.0 classes.
> I've update the maven build so two jar's are now created.
> 1) tika-server-VERSION.jar correct clean jar
> 2) tika-server-VERSION-standalone.jar what was previously created
> This in my view is more inline with how maven should be being used to create 
> jars as the previous way restricted the consumers ability to override maven 
> dependencies.
> I've also updated the documentation in source control that refs to 
> tika-server to include the new tika-server standalone jar. I realize other 
> documentation might also need to change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to