I know it's been a little bit since we talked about 2.0. We had
discussed holding off while some API changes that were under
consideration. Has any progress been made on this? The community has
been really good about dual maintaining but how much longer do we want
to have this expectation? Can we consider cutting 2.0 without some of
these changes and do them in 3.0 or is that a non-starter? Other thoughts?
- Bob Paulin
On 8/11/2016 2:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
Sounds good to me
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect, Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 8/11/16, 11:59 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote:
All,
Any interest in a Tika 1.14 release in a few weeks, say first week of
September? I'd like to test and integrate POI 3.15-beta3 which should be out
fairly soon. Any other blockers or wishes?
Cheers,
Tim
