[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17248166#comment-17248166
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3180:
-----------------------------------
I just pushed a first draft to the {{TIKA-3180}} branch. I still have to
figure out how to add back in the XMPWriter and deal with the POI dependencies
in the Unpacker.
My goal is to have a tika-server-core module that doesn't include any parsers.
The {{tika-server-classic}} module will depend on that and add the parsers from
{{tika-parsers-classic}}. This will allow folks who don't want all of the
dependencies in {{tika-parsers-classic}} to use tika server with a smaller set
of dependencies.
All, please take a look.
[~epugh] [~dep4b], please take a look and confirm that I didn't break any of
your work. I _think_ it belongs in tika-server-classic, not tika-server-core.
Let me know, though.
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Modularize tika-server
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-3180
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3180
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Major
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
> What do fellow devs think about having a tika-server-core which would be just
> the server/wrapper code without any dependencies on {{tika-parsers}} and then
> a tika-server with the usual dependency on {{tika-parsers}}.
> As we move to more modularity, I'd think some users might want the server
> {{tika-server-core}}, but then maybe only include a subset of the parsers.
> WDYT?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
