[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17251612#comment-17251612
]
Peter Lee commented on TIKA-3180:
---------------------------------
Seems some tests are failed, see
[https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/org.apache.tika$tika-server-core/lastBuild/console]
Looks like some test files are missed in the last commit. :)
Some of the files could be found in git log :
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/fake_oom.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/heavy_hang_100.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/heavy_hang_30000.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/null_pointer.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/real_oom.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/system_exit.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/testStaticStdOutErr.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/testStdOutErr.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/thread_interrupt.xml
The others look like new added files :
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/hello_world.xml
tika-server/tika-server-core/src/test/resources/test-documents/mock/encrypted_document_exception.xml
Not sure why Jenkins only report an unstable build result. Considering some
tests are failed, it should be a failed build test.
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Modularize tika-server
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-3180
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3180
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Major
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
> What do fellow devs think about having a tika-server-core which would be just
> the server/wrapper code without any dependencies on {{tika-parsers}} and then
> a tika-server with the usual dependency on {{tika-parsers}}.
> As we move to more modularity, I'd think some users might want the server
> {{tika-server-core}}, but then maybe only include a subset of the parsers.
> WDYT?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
