The move to weekly dependabot has been a bit of a relief for me personally. Our mail list isn't clogged w daily dependabot updates (and yes, I know I can apply a filter :/).
How is it working for everyone else? On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:09 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > >you start deleting them reflexively out of your email! > Not Tilman!!! > > Let's move to weekly and see how that works? > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 3:57 PM Eric Pugh > <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > > > > Hence why I like the monthly unless it’s a special case…. The flood of > updates just means you start deleting them reflexively out of your email! > Now, if you have a dependency and you’re maybe actively working on it, and > it’s changing quickly, then that might be an argument for daily. > > > > > On Apr 10, 2024, at 12:53 PM, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> > wrote: > > > > > > I'm fine with daily because this way we can learn ASAP if there are > troubles with new dependency versions, although I'm now too busy. > > > > > > Tilman > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Original-Nachricht -- > > > Von: Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> > > > Betreff: Bump dependabot to weekly? > > > Datum: 10.04.2024, 18:08 Uhr > > > An: <dev@tika.apache.org> <dev@tika.apache.org> > > > > > > All, > > > Tilman has been doing heroic work keeping us up to date with > > > dependabot's PRs. Given our pace of releases, would it make sense to > > > backoff to weekly updates? > > > Before running regression tests, we'd run the update plugin to make > > > sure that we're up to date. > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > _______________________ > > Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw > > > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > whether attachments are marked as such. > > >
