How is it more stable if we allow overrides when ci doesn't work? Hudson/Jenkins have been quite flaky, but github has been _pretty good_?
I do like "merge when succeeds". Do we need overrides for that? >I prefer it to be the responsibility of every user to test locally before committing. Sorry. I've been relying more and more on PRs triggering actions for that. certainly not on main. On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 1:17 PM Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure if I like that but I'd love to hear other opinions. The CI > build takes very long, and the CI isn't really reliable. And if override > can be allowed then it's not really a strong rule. I prefer it to be the > responsibility of every user to test locally before committing. > Tilman > > Am 17.12.2025 um 19:09 schrieb Nicholas DiPiazza: > > i suggest we make a change to apache/tika github > > > > main branch requires passing CI > > but override can be allowed. > > > > reason: this allows us to keep main more stable, and also allows us to > use > > the "merge when succeeds" > > > >
