Yep as long as we can get merge when succeeds I'm happy camper On Wed, Dec 17, 2025, 2:39 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote:
> How is it more stable if we allow overrides when ci doesn't work? > Hudson/Jenkins have been quite flaky, but github has been _pretty good_? > > I do like "merge when succeeds". Do we need overrides for that? > > > >I prefer it to be the responsibility of every user to test locally before > committing. > Sorry. I've been relying more and more on PRs triggering actions for that. > certainly not on main. > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 1:17 PM Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm not sure if I like that but I'd love to hear other opinions. The CI > > build takes very long, and the CI isn't really reliable. And if override > > can be allowed then it's not really a strong rule. I prefer it to be the > > responsibility of every user to test locally before committing. > > Tilman > > > > Am 17.12.2025 um 19:09 schrieb Nicholas DiPiazza: > > > i suggest we make a change to apache/tika github > > > > > > main branch requires passing CI > > > but override can be allowed. > > > > > > reason: this allows us to keep main more stable, and also allows us to > > use > > > the "merge when succeeds" > > > > > > > >
