[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15375458#comment-15375458
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1374:
-------------------------------------------
Why should we have multiple implementations in TinkerPop? In my opinion it
would be sufficient to have an order preserving Tree implementation.
A simpler implementation could help to improve performance and memory usage,
but what's the thought behind it? Should we have a strategy that makes a
decision on which Tree implementation should be used?
> Consider making Tree an interface
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1374
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1374
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: structure
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0-incubating
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Priority: Minor
>
> Tree should be an interface and we should have:
> * OrderedTree
> * SimpleTree
> * BlahTree
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
