Github user robertdale commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/631#discussion_r123511769
  
    --- Diff: 
gremlin-test/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/PropertyTest.java
 ---
    @@ -59,14 +59,40 @@
         public static class BasicPropertyTest extends AbstractGremlinTest {
             @Test
             @FeatureRequirementSet(FeatureRequirementSet.Package.VERTICES_ONLY)
    -        public void shouldHaveStandardStringRepresentation() {
    +        public void 
shouldHaveStandardStringRepresentationForVertexProperty() {
                 final Vertex v = graph.addVertex("name", "marko");
                 final Property p = v.property("name");
                 assertEquals(StringFactory.propertyString(p), p.toString());
             }
     
             @Test
             @FeatureRequirementSet(FeatureRequirementSet.Package.VERTICES_ONLY)
    +        public void 
shouldHaveTruncatedStringRepresentationForVertexProperty() {
    +            final Vertex v = graph.addVertex("name", "maria de la santa 
cruz rosalina agnelia rodriguez cuellar rene");
    +            final Property p = v.property("name");
    +            assertEquals(StringFactory.propertyString(p), p.toString());
    --- End diff --
    
    The only thing that this test validates is that the toString has the same 
output as the StringFactory which may be all well and good.  However, if 
StringFactory changes, the would still pass, but there could be an end-user 
display impact that isn't caught.  I'm not against it as long as we all 
understand the implications. I prefer hardcoded expectations to catch these 
things.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to