Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/712
I finally found some time to work on this again and fixed the issues
mentioned by @jorgebay. However, I left the `Bindings` implementation unchanged
despite the problems with concurrent access as it seems to be still the best
solution. (I'm of course open for suggestions on how this can be improved.)
I also noticed that my changes broke the `WithoutStrategies` source step as
that now correctly expects to get the `Types` of the Strategies to exclude for
which Gremlin.Net had no serializer. So I added a serializer that works
basically like the respective one in gremlin-python as it also simply creates
an object of the `Type` and then this object will be serialized as before. A
unit test ensures that all Strategies have a parameterless constructor as we
can't serialize their `Type` otherwise.
Honestly, I was a bit surprised that I had to serialize `Types` by
serializing an empty object of that `Type` although the IO docs show that the
GraphSON type `g:Class` [can be serialized like
this](http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.3.0/dev/io/#_class):
```json
{
"@type" : "g:Class",
"@value" : "java.io.File"
}
```
but the Gremlin Server couldn't deserialize the Strategy class when I
serialized it like this. So is the documentation wrong here? @spmallette: Could
you clarify my confusion here?
Also the IO docs don't mention how `TraversalStrategies` are serialized in
general. Should we add that?
The build is currently failing, but that seems to be caused by
travis-ci/travis-ci#8607. I built Gremlin.Net locally and executed the tests
without any problems.
BTW: Would it make sense to create a separate pull request for `master` or
can we simply execute `generate.groovy` later when this is merged from `tp32`
into `master`?
---