[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16935890#comment-16935890
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1810:
-------------------------------------------
spmallette commented on pull request #1192: TINKERPOP-1810 Support for
withSack() that use Lambdas with remotes
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1192
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Add Lambda.binaryOperator and Lambda.unaryOperator
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1810
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.2.6
> Reporter: Ted Wilmes
> Assignee: stephen mallette
> Priority: Major
>
> While working with sack and lambdas, I found that I could not specify a split
> ({{UnaryOperator}}) or merge ({{BinaryOperator}}) operator remotely using the
> {{Lambda}} class helper methods. The sack supplier worked without issue
> because we already have {{Lambda.supplier}}. I propose we add
> {{Lambda.unaryOperator}} and {{Lambda.binaryOperator}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
