[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17695929#comment-17695929
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2824:
-------------------------------------------

Cole-Greer commented on code in PR #1843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1843#discussion_r1123865203


##########
docs/src/upgrade/release-3.7.x.asciidoc:
##########
@@ -29,9 +29,73 @@ Please see the 
link:https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.7.0/CHANGELOG.asc
 
 === Upgrading for Users
 
+==== Properties on Elements
+
+===== Introduction
+
+By default properties on Elements are now returned for OLTP requests. Gremlin 
Server 3.5 and 3.6 does not return properties by default. 
+More hitory details about serialization of properties can be found in the 
link:https://lists.apache.org/thread/xltcon4zxnwq4fyw2r2126syyrqm8spy[Stephen's 
post].
+
+===== Behavior for OLAP queries
+
+Queries still won't return Properties on Elements. The main reason for this is 
performance considerations.
+If you need to get a properties, then this can be explicitly configured with 
`HaltedTraverserStrategy`
+
+[source,java]
+----
+  g.withComputer().withStrategies(HaltedTraverserFactoryStrategy.detached())
+----
+
+===== Output compare for Gremlin Server 3.5/3.6 and 3.7
+
+Let's take a closer look at Javascript GLV code example in 3.6 and 3.7
+
+[source,javascript]
+----
+  const client = new Client('ws://localhost:8182/gremlin',{traversalSource: 
'gmodern'});
+  await client.open();
+  const result = await client.submit('g.V(1)');
+  console.log(JSON.stringify(result.first()));
+  await client.close();
+----
+
+The result will be different depending on the version of Gremlin Server.
+For 3.5/3.6:
+[source,json]
+----
+  {"id":1,"label":"person"}
+----
+
+For 3.7:
+[source,json]
+----
+  
{"id":1,"label":"person","properties":{"name":[{"id":0,"label":"name","value":"marko","key":"name"}],"age":[{"id":1,"label":"age","value":29,"key":"age"}]}}
+--

> Properties on Elements
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dotnet, driver, go, javascript, process, python
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.4
>            Reporter: Valentyn Kahamlyk
>            Assignee: Valentyn Kahamlyk
>            Priority: Major
>
> Problem: When a user writes `g.V()` they get back a Vertex object. The 
> problem is that depending on the execution context of the traversal, the 
> result could be quite different, with or without properties.
> Solution: Implement new finalization strategy DetachStrategy(detachMode, 
> properties) where mode is one of ALL, NONE or CUSTOM. `properties` is list of 
> properties name, are taken into account only for CUSTOM mode.
> Discussion thread in dev list: [Proposal to handle properties on response 
> Elements-Apache Mail 
> Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8rw7ydj7kym8vhtwk50nhbp45ng9986]
> Stephen's thread in dev list: [The Issue of Detachment-Apache Mail 
> Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/xltcon4zxnwq4fyw2r2126syyrqm8spy]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to