[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17761436#comment-17761436 ]
Norio Akagi commented on TINKERPOP-2423: ---------------------------------------- AbstractStep should be ok because labels are Set, not List. So we don't have redundant label item that can reset each other by taking XOR. > hashCode collision for steps with different attributes > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TINKERPOP-2423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2423 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Bug > Components: process > Affects Versions: 3.4.8 > Reporter: Saikiran Boga > Priority: Major > > The {{hashCode computation}} for PropertiesStep collides for multiple steps > when there are repeating keys. For example {{.properties()}} and > {{.properties("a","a")}}, {{.properties("a")}} and > .{{properties("a","b","b")}} have the same hash code because of xor of just > properties here > [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/cff4c161615f2b50bda27b6ba523c7f52b833532/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/map/PropertiesStep.java#L80-L87]. > Basically, the even keys cancel out the xor computation. > > The same is also true for {{AbstractStep.hashCode}} which takes xor of labels. > {{GraphStep}} does the same thing using ids. so {{g.V("1", "1")}} and > {{g.V()}} would collide during comparison. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)