Hi Yang, Sorry for chiming in late on this, I think a milestone release is a great idea. One thing I would like to add is that I believe it’s about time to merge master-http into master as it would make the most sense to release the milestone out of master. One peculiarity of this is that currently master-http has disabled the github actions for the GLVs which have yet to be converted from websockets to http. In my opinion, we can merge master-http into master with these tests disabled, and they can be turned back on as additional GLVs are converted to http.
If there are no concerns with this approach, I would like to suggest that we PR master-http to master within the next few weeks. Thanks, Cole From: Yang Xia <xia...@apache.org> Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 at 1:00 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org <dev@tinkerpop.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release of a Milestone Build for TinkerPop 4.0 Yeah, I think that makes sense to do so for tx(). Also, given there are no further comments or feedback, I'll assume lazy consensus for having a TP4.0 milestone release as user preview. Cheers, Yang On 2024/10/10 16:56:19 Ken Hu wrote: > Looking through the master-http branch, it seems like transactions aren't > ready yet. It might be best to disable tx() and other similar functions > just so users aren't confused in that case. So maybe just throw an > exception in those cases? > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 5:51 PM Yang Xia <xia...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > As we get closer towards the end of the year, a lot of changes have been > > implemented for 4.0 in the master-http branch. While there is still a lot > > to do before we are ready for a full 4.0 release, it would be good to > > release a milestone build of what is done so far to gather feedback. > > > > This milestone would roughly offer the opportunity to try Gremlin Server > > HTTP with the revised GraphSON and GraphBinary serialization formats for > > this version, using Java and Python drivers. These drivers will initially > > continue to support GraphSON as it can help with debugging (given its human > > readable format) and offers wider serialization options for users in these > > early days, though, as mentioned in previous posts, we should expect to > > just have GraphBinary support for drivers in the future for simplicity. > > > > Also, as this is a “milestone” release, we should consider it an official > > one as opposed to a SNAPSHOT or dev release candidate. Please respond if > > you have any thoughts on this. If there is no feedback by October 11th, I > > will assume a lazy consensus in favour of such a milestone release. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Yang > > >
