[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17941998#comment-17941998
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-3047:
-------------------------------------------
spmallette commented on code in PR #3091:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3091#discussion_r2033980029
##########
gremlin-language/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/language/grammar/ReferenceGrammarTest.java:
##########
@@ -89,29 +94,73 @@ public class ReferenceGrammarTest extends
AbstractGrammarTest {
}};
@Parameterized.Parameters(name = "{0}")
- public static Iterable<String> queries() throws IOException {
- final Set<String> gremlins = new
LinkedHashSet<>(DocumentationReader.parse(docsDir));
- gremlins.addAll(FeatureReader.parseGrouped(featureDir,
stringMatcherConverters).values().stream().flatMap(Collection::stream).collect(Collectors.toList()));
- return gremlins;
+ public static Iterable<Pair<String, ParserRule>> parseTestItems() throws
IOException {
+ // gremlin scripts from docs
+ final Set<Pair<String, ParserRule>> scripts =
DocumentationReader.parse(docsDir).
+ stream().map(g -> Pair.with(g, ParserRule.QUERY_LIST)).
+ collect(Collectors.toCollection(LinkedHashSet::new));
+
+ // helps make sure we're actually adding test scripts for each load.
there are well over 500 gremlin
+ // examples in the docs so we should have at least that much
+ int size = scripts.size();
+ assert size > 500;
Review Comment:
yep - making sure scripts increment in size is not what this test is about.
the java asserts simply validate that our test is setup as we expect it to be.
> Grammar does not parse keywords into Map keys
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-3047
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3047
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: language
> Affects Versions: 3.7.1
> Reporter: Stephen Mallette
> Priority: Critical
>
> {{[keys: ["a","b"]}} won't work because "keys" ends up being parsed to
> {{Column.keys}}. another issue at play is the use of parens to wrap certain
> key definitions but not others. it doesn't feel consistent. like, it will
> work for {{T}} values but not for something like "edges" which is just a
> keyword token. Not sure it's wrong but it requires some examination.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)