[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17955959#comment-17955959
 ] 

Peter Tribe commented on TINKERPOP-3115:
----------------------------------------

Issue resolved as part of PR

https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3121

> Better handle overflows with sum()
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-3115
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3115
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.7.2
>            Reporter: Stephen Mallette
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: breaking
>
> {{code}}
> gremlin> g.inject([(byte) 126, (byte) 2]).sum(local)
> ==>-128
> {{code}}
> that output seems unexpected. oddly it didn't work that way for the global 
> version of {{sum()}} because the type auto promoted to {{long}} because there 
> was multiplication by the {{bulk}} which was {{long}}. That changed on 
> TINKERPOP-3088 though so now even the global version will work like this. 
> seems like it would be better to promote they type whenever it didn't fit 
> into the space allotted. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to