[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18022764#comment-18022764
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2234:
-------------------------------------------

spmallette commented on code in PR #3211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3211#discussion_r2378907910


##########
gremlin-test/src/main/resources/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/test/features/filter/TypeOf.feature:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,630 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+# distributed with this work for additional information
+# regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+# with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+# software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+# "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+# KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+# specific language governing permissions and limitations
+# under the License.
+
+@StepClassFilter @StepIs
+Feature: Predicate - typeOf()
+
+  Scenario: g_V_valuesXageX_isXtypeOfXGType_INTXX
+    Given the modern graph
+    And the traversal of
+      """
+      g.V().values("age").is(P.typeOf(GType.INT))
+      """
+    When iterated to list
+    Then the result should be unordered
+      | result |
+      | d[29].i |
+      | d[27].i |
+      | d[32].i |
+      | d[35].i |
+
+  Scenario: g_V_valuesXnameX_isXtypeOfXGType_STRINGXX
+    Given the modern graph
+    And the traversal of
+      """
+      g.V().values("name").is(P.typeOf(GType.STRING))
+      """
+    When iterated to list
+    Then the result should be unordered
+      | result |
+      | marko |
+      | vadas |
+      | lop |
+      | josh |
+      | ripple |
+      | peter |
+
+  Scenario: g_V_isXtypeOfXGType_VERTEXXX_count
+    Given the modern graph
+    And the traversal of
+      """
+      g.V().is(P.typeOf(GType.VERTEX)).count()
+      """
+    When iterated to list
+    Then the result should be unordered
+      | result |
+      | d[6].l |
+
+  Scenario: g_E_isXtypeOfXGType_EDGEXX_count
+    Given the modern graph
+    And the traversal of
+      """
+      g.E().is(P.typeOf(GType.EDGE)).count()
+      """
+    When iterated to list
+    Then the result should be unordered
+      | result |
+      | d[6].l |
+
+  Scenario: g_V_propertiesXnameX_isXtypeOfXGType_PROPERTYXX_count
+    Given the modern graph
+    And the traversal of
+      """
+      g.V().properties("name").is(P.typeOf(GType.PROPERTY)).count()
+      """
+    When iterated to list
+    Then the result should be unordered
+      | result |
+      | d[6].l |
+
+  Scenario: g_V_valuesXageX_isXtypeOfXGType_NUMBERXX
+    Given the modern graph
+    And the traversal of
+      """
+      g.V().values("age").is(P.typeOf(GType.NUMBER))
+      """
+    When iterated to list
+    Then the result should be unordered
+      | result |
+      | d[29].i |
+      | d[27].i |
+      | d[32].i |
+      | d[35].i |
+
+  Scenario: g_V_valuesXageX_isXtypeOfXGType_BYTEXX

Review Comment:
   testing a lot of negatives here which is good. where are the feature tests 
for positives for all these types?
   
   By defining types for Gremlin in `GType` I feel like we've elevated those 
selected ones to have special meaning. I understand none of our example graphs 
have that kind of data at this point, but I think that's a call to expand what 
our test framework can do. We already have the kitchen sink graph for this sort 
of thing. I think you should expand that dataset to throw in some data for 
this. Maybe one vertex label per testable data type (that can be stored as a 
property), so that you could do `g.V().hasLabel("double", 
"string").is(typeOf(NUMBER))` and assert the right stuff.
   
   I didn't examine this carefully, but i don't see positive tests for GRAPH 
and TREE. What else is missing? 
   
   Perhaps it would be wise to break this feature test up into: 
`TypeOfNumber.feature`, `TypeOfGraph.feature`, etc. for some specific testing 
of grouped types then keep `TypeOf.feature` as a catch-all for everything else? 





> Introduce Type Predicate
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2234
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2234
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.2
>            Reporter: Stephen Mallette
>            Priority: Major
>
> Provide for a {{typeOf()}} predicate that allows for testing the type of an 
> object which would enable neat things like:
> {code}
> g.V().outE().has('weight',gt(0.1)).inV().path().unfold().is(typeOf(VERTEX))
> {code}
> See the linked DISCUSS thread for more information.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to