[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15141443#comment-15141443
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-916:
------------------------------------------
Github user dkuppitz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/216#issuecomment-182528791
* `mvn clean install`: passed
* integration tests: passed
Code looks good.
VOTE: +1
> Develop a better "simple" driver for testing and example purposes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-916
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-916
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: driver
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2-incubating
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Assignee: stephen mallette
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1.2-incubating
>
>
> We currently have a some "simple" drivers here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/tree/b2ef5a369684903086e4c10b81cfbc47ff80f6bd/gremlin-driver/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/driver/simple
> They are "simple" in that they don't do anything smart and are very
> no-frills. They don't hide very much in their implementations which makes
> them good for forcing certain behaviors in Gremlin Server tests. That said,
> they kinda stink and are awkward to work with. Would be nice if they were a
> bit more refined in what they do.
> I think they should minimally work in such a fashion where you can send a
> blocking request (in addition to callback-style one that's already there of
> course). Basically, it should be easy to send a raw {{RequestMessage}} and
> get back a {{ResponseMessage}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)