I agree with everything that has been said.  The dev life cycle is open and
accessible.  More and more folks are getting interested in TinkerPop and I
think we'll continue to see a steady growth in the community of committers
and people who take part through the forum, creating, and commenting on
JIRAs.  The work accomplished during incubation has served as a strong
foundation for the continued success of TinkerPop as top level project.

Thanks,
Ted

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Broecheler <m...@matthiasb.com>
wrote:

> I agree. TinkerPop exhibits a high level of maturity in its output and
> internal management. In addition, it has demonstrated a willingness and
> ability to adapt the Apache-way-of-life.
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:37 PM Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I concur that we are ready.
> >
> >         * We have a continually growing committer pool.
> >         * We have sound PR model in place.
> >         * We have had numerous releases.
> >         * Our documentation, website, tutorials, integration testing,
> etc.
> > are all solid.
> >
> > Time to move on to the next level,
> > Marko.
> >
> > http://markorodriguez.com
> >
> > On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Given that we've resolved the issues presented by our mentor Daniel
> Gruno
> > > in the ASF Maturity Model (that he was good enough to fill out for us),
> > it
> > > seems that the next step is to more officially achieve some consensus
> on
> > > graduating. Let's use this thread to handle sorting out any issues
> > related
> > > to that.
> > >
> > > I believe that while the ASF Maturity Model isn't a mandatory
> assessment
> > > required for graduation, I think it provided an accurate picture of
> where
> > > TinkerPop is right now.  We have a solid community with great
> > contributors
> > > that continues to grow. Based on these things, I'd say it's time to
> move
> > > forward with graduation from incubator!
> > >
> > > This is meant to be a community discussion, so please feel free to
> > provide
> > > your thoughts on this matter.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Stephen
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to