+1 from me. There has been more and more involvement from the community. The effort put towards transparency and collaborative decision making (discuss/vote) has become a second nature and is paying off. The current review PR model is very accessible for any contributors and guaranties quality code. The code freeze, CI, and release models go in that direction as well. Adding to that there is a real effort put towards support for implementations/integrations with other Apache projects. And at the risk of turning this into a boring list : The documentation is thorough with the added bonus of easy access tutorials for people starting out. (and constant discussions around what new material to add)
So all in all TinkerPop has really shaped itself into a solid project. I too think it's time to move on to the next level. Cheers everyone for your hard work. On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with everything that has been said. The dev life cycle is open and > accessible. More and more folks are getting interested in TinkerPop and I > think we'll continue to see a steady growth in the community of committers > and people who take part through the forum, creating, and commenting on > JIRAs. The work accomplished during incubation has served as a strong > foundation for the continued success of TinkerPop as top level project. > > Thanks, > Ted > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Broecheler <m...@matthiasb.com> > wrote: > > > I agree. TinkerPop exhibits a high level of maturity in its output and > > internal management. In addition, it has demonstrated a willingness and > > ability to adapt the Apache-way-of-life. > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:37 PM Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I concur that we are ready. > > > > > > * We have a continually growing committer pool. > > > * We have sound PR model in place. > > > * We have had numerous releases. > > > * Our documentation, website, tutorials, integration testing, > > etc. > > > are all solid. > > > > > > Time to move on to the next level, > > > Marko. > > > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Given that we've resolved the issues presented by our mentor Daniel > > Gruno > > > > in the ASF Maturity Model (that he was good enough to fill out for > us), > > > it > > > > seems that the next step is to more officially achieve some consensus > > on > > > > graduating. Let's use this thread to handle sorting out any issues > > > related > > > > to that. > > > > > > > > I believe that while the ASF Maturity Model isn't a mandatory > > assessment > > > > required for graduation, I think it provided an accurate picture of > > where > > > > TinkerPop is right now. We have a solid community with great > > > contributors > > > > that continues to grow. Based on these things, I'd say it's time to > > move > > > > forward with graduation from incubator! > > > > > > > > This is meant to be a community discussion, so please feel free to > > > provide > > > > your thoughts on this matter. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > > > > >
