On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 15:07 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > The resultant package is significantly smaller,
Ok, not trying to nit pick this. But if we are talking about commons-dbcp.jar and naming-factory-dbcp.jar. The latter sure does not seem smaller? -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 106216 Jul 23 14:24 /usr/share/commons-dbcp/lib/commons-dbcp.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 wlt users 154109 Apr 14 14:09 Desktop/apache-tomcat-5.5.17/common/lib/naming-factory-dbcp.jar So it's not smaller by any means. Which would make sense since it's not just commons-dbcp being re-packaged. Aspects of commons-collections and commons-pool are included in naming-factory-dbcp.jar. If naming-factory-dbcp.jar could be built or etc with those as binary dependencies it would be fine. That would be more like the rest of Tomcat's build system. It's just that one jar, that has a unique way of being built. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
