Konstantin,
On 11/13/25 4:52 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
чт, 13 нояб. 2025 г. в 13:35, Mark Thomas <[email protected]>:
On 13/11/2025 10:30, [email protected] wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 3dca097687 Fix complete status output with a failed context
3dca097687 is described below
commit 3dca097687e935e57d28e9b915f8d8a4b3d3c0a5
Author: Mark Thomas <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu Nov 13 10:29:49 2025 +0000
Fix complete status output with a failed context
Before I back port this, what do folks think about adding stateName to
the output?
It changes the HTML output but no-one should be parsing that (that is
what the JSON is for).
It adds a property to the JSON output but that should be OK. Anyone
parsing the JSON output should just ignore the new property.
In summary, I think this is OK to back port but I wanted to see what
other folks thought.
+1 to add "State" (stateName) to the output. It is valuable.
1. I'd prefer to name it "state" instead of "stateName" in JSON.
+1 for "state" over "stateName".
-chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
