> My trusted information sources concerning i5/OS (yes, such exist :) ) Sure :)
> tell me, that it's quite common out there to not support R3 any more. Well yes > On the other hand: if we really get enough benefit from dropping support > during 1.2 now and not for the next major version, is unclear to me. > This mainly is concerning you, because you are the one who maintains > that part. I maintain but since I didn't get access anymore to V5R3 or below, I couldn't guarantee anything. Also it will make the code cleaner (less #ifdef...) > I think it's obvious, that we should drop the V3 support for anything > beyond 1.2.x, I'm not so sure about dropping it near the end of 1.2.x. Safe decision... > Maybe we can let all those defines for 1.2.x in there, but include docs > information, that we don't test any longer against V3 (use on your own > risk) and only fully support V4. A note shouldn't hurt. Did there is a date for 1.2.25 release ? > Henri Gomez wrote: > > Hi to all, > > > > We want to clean up a little the mod_jk code defines specific to > > i5/OS, and plan to make V5R4 OS as a minimum requirement. > > > > Since all i5 systems are now in V5R4 I couldn't test or build for V5R3 > > and previous release. > > > > Did there is i5/OS users with V5R3 and previous release ? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
