Jim Jagielski wrote: > [X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns > as well as the problems which started this whole > thing. > [ ] 0. Whatever. > [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: >
With the following caveats: - There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is too much overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the patches will be ported from 6.x - Where a patch for 3, 4 or 5 is required that just doesn't make sense in the dev branch then the patch is applied using RTC. - We review this process in 3 months time to see if it is providing the expected benefits without excessive overheads. - We improve the "Which version?" web page to make clear which branches are supported and at what level. I'll start a wiki page as a draft of this. - The "Get involved" pages are updated to document this process --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]