Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: >> jean-frederic clere wrote: >>> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>>> Mark Thomas wrote: >>>>> Next attempt. >>>>> >>>>> Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is >>>>> below. >>>>> >>>>> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk >>>>> >>>>> svn cp >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_14 >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk >>>> Instead, I would propose to tag a new 6.0.15 candidate first. >>> >>> That is also what I proposed in my previous comment. >> >> Didn't see it, sorry. I propose tagging a 6.0.15 candidate on Monday. > Can we wait a bit, there are a few bug fixes that need to be caught up > on , and I also think we can improve upon the server.xml invalid > attribute implementation, the way I did the sandbox. I'll come up withe > patches for the bug
What is the PR number? Cheers Jean-Frederic and the fixes for the invalid attribute thingy, and > put them in the status file > > Filip >> >> Rémy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
