William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> Mark Thomas wrote: >>> Mark Thomas wrote: >>>> svn cp >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk >>>> >>>> Changes to .../trunk with be CTR >>>> Changes to .../6.1.x/trunk will be RTC >>> As per the previously published plan, I will create tomcat/tc6.1.x/trunk >>> and tomcat/trunk from the 6.0.15 tag. I plan to do this sometime on >>> Friday >>> afternoon GMT. >> >> Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted >> stable? > > Contrawise, why wait, and why a tag? Usually most efforts (in order to > preserve history) branch from trunk or branches, whereas tags/* reflect > an endpoint (end of history). Simply branch from 6.0.x unless there are > dirty secrets buried in there :)
Because 6.0.15 (assuming it is stable) is intended to be the end of the 6.0.x branch. It is expected that the tag 6.0.15 == 6.0.x trunk. There was a long discussion in this thread: http://marc.info/?t=119154952900016&r=1&w=2 which was distilled into a new proposal: http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=119170194116793&w=2 Mark > > Bill > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]