Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >>> Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted >>> stable? >>> >> >> We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen >> to get >> back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having RTC a real pain. >> > he he, I think everyone does, however two months ago you said > "I don't see a need for a separate 6.0.x and 6.1.x development at this > point. I have yet to see a convincing technical argument that there is > something sufficiently new and/or different to justify this overhead." > > has anything changed since before when we had trunk and 6.0.x, to the > point where we have more resources and more todos to maintain 6.0.x, > 6.1.x and trunk? This is one more branch than we used to have. > > wouldn't it be better to hold of on the 6.1.x until there is a feature > set for that release, and only have trunk. Otherwise we will have two > 6.0.x branches, just one is named 6.1.x but there is nothing different > with them
Yep. I also prefer to have only trunk based on 6.0.15 I don't think we need 6.1.x for the moment. We should be able to make proposals for tc6.0.x back porting using commits from trunk for a while. Additional I think we should also create/prepare a ROADMAP in/for this trunk to discuss what the new features we want to put inside. Cheers Jean-Frederic > > > Filip > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
